#News Skip to main content IFRAME: https://www.googletagmanager.com/ns.html?id=GTM-TDB29T Home Home * Admissions + Undergraduate + Graduate + Continuing education * Research + Engage with us + Support for researchers + Using research to engage + Recognition * News & Events + Events + Features + Oxford profiles + Oxford and coronavirus + Ukraine + News releases for journalists + Filming in Oxford + Find An Expert * About + Organisation + Facts and figures + Oxford people + Oxford Access + International Oxford + Building Our Future + Jobs + 牛津大学 Search ______________________________ Search News & Events * Events + Regular events in the University Year + University Events Office * Features * Oxford profiles * Oxford and coronavirus * Ukraine * News releases for journalists * Filming in Oxford * Find An Expert The Tube strike resulted in workers having to find alternative routes which in some cases were more convenient. The Tube strike resulted in workers having to find alternative routes which in some cases were more convenient. Shutterstock images Published 15 Sep 2015 Share This Tweet Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit HomeNewsThe London Tube strike 'brought economic benefits for workers' The London Tube strike 'brought economic benefits for workers' PolicyResearch New analysis of the London Tube strike in February 2014 finds that it enabled a sizeable fraction of commuters to find better routes to work, and actually produced a net economic benefit due to the number of people who found more efficient ways to get to work. The researchers from the University of Oxford and the University of Cambridge analysed 20 days’ worth of anonymised Oyster card data, containing more than 200 million data points, in order to see how individual Tube journeys changed during the strike. Since this particular strike only resulted in a partial closure of the Tube network and not all commuters were affected by the strike, a direct comparison was possible. The data enabled the researchers to see whether people chose to go back to their normal commute once the strike was over, or if they found a more efficient route and decided to switch. The researchers found that of the regular commuters affected by the strike, either because certain stations were closed or because travel times were considerably different, a significant fraction – about one in 20 – decided to stick with their new route once the strike was over. While the proportion of individuals who ended up changing their routes may sound small, the researchers found that the strike actually ended up producing a net economic benefit. By performing a cost-benefit analysis of the amount of time saved by those who changed their daily commute, the researchers found that the amount of time saved in the longer term actually outweighed the time lost by commuters during the strike. The London Tube map itself may have been a reason why many commuters did not find their optimal journey before the strike. In many parts of London, the actual distances between stations are distorted on the iconic map. By digitising the Tube map and comparing it to the actual distances between stations, the researchers found that those commuters living in, or travelling to, parts of London where distortion is greatest were more likely to have learned from the strike and found a more efficient route. Additionally, since different Tube lines travel at different speeds, those commuters who had been travelling on one of the slower lines were also more likely to switch routes once the strike was over. 'One of the things we’re looking at is whether consumers usually make the best decision, but it’s never been empirically tested using a large consumer dataset such as this one,' said co-author Dr Ferninand Rauch from Oxford’s Department of Economics. 'Our findings illustrate that people might get stuck with suboptimal decisions because they don’t experiment enough.' 'Given that a significant fraction of commuters on the London underground failed to find their optimal route until they were forced to experiment, perhaps we should not be too frustrated that we can’t always get what we want, or that others sometimes take decisions for us,' said co-author Dr Tim Willems, also from Oxford’s Department of Economics. 'If we behave anything like London commuters and experiment too little, hitting such constraints may very well be to our long-term advantage.' According to the authors, being forced to alter a routine, whether that’s due to a Tube strike or government regulation, can often lead to net benefits, as people or corporations are forced to innovate. In economics, this is known as the Porter hypothesis. 'For the small fraction of commuters who found a better route, when multiplied over a longer period of time, the benefit to them actually outweighs the inconvenience suffered by many more,' said co-author Dr Shaun Larcom of Cambridge’s Department of Land Economy. 'The net gains came from the disruption itself.' Subscribe to News Latest * View of Oxford University New Year Honours 2023 31 Dec 2022 * Image depicting molnupiravir pills - Shutterstock Molnupiravir doesn't reduce COVID-19 hospitalisations in high-risk vaccinated people 23 Dec 2022 * Professor Teresa Lambe receives the Irish Abroad award from Irish President Michael D. Higgins - photo by Maxwell Photography Oxford vaccinologist Teresa Lambe honoured with Irish Abroad award 20 Dec 2022 * Oxford experiment in space Oxford students successfully send an experiment into space 20 Dec 2022 * New study finds logged tropical forests are surprisingly vibrant and need protection New study finds logged tropical forests are surprisingly vibrant and need protection 19 Dec 2022 Further information * Working paper study * Oxford Department of Economics DISCOVER MORE * Support Oxford's research * Partner with Oxford on research * Study at Oxford * Research jobs at Oxford ALL NEWS You can view all news or browse by category All news Media coverage Financial Times The Times Economist The Independent Share This Tweet Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Connect with us * iTunes * YouTube * Facebook * Twitter * LinkedIn * Weibo * Instagram * Medium * The Conversation Information About * Oxford University * Strategic plan * Oxford's research * Course fees and funding * Libraries * Museums and collections * Open days * Oxford glossary * Freedom of speech statement * Statement on Modern Slavery * Data privacy / GDPR * Sport at Oxford * Conferences at Oxford * 牛津大学 Information For * Prospective undergraduates * Prospective graduate students * Prospective Continuing Education students * Prospective online/distance learning students * Current Oxford students * Current Oxford staff * Oxford residents/Community * Visitors/Tourists * Media * Alumni * Teachers * Parliamentarians * Businesses/Partnerships Quick Links * Any questions? * Jobs and vacancies * Term dates * Map * Nexus365 email * Giving to Oxford * Oxford University Images * © University of Oxford 2022 * Contact us * About this site * Legal * Privacy policy * Cookie settings * Accessibility Statement